Abstract

Methodological issues on the radiofrequency (RF) induced heating on tissues implanted with thin metallic structures are investigated. The particular case of the RF used in the clinical 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners has been studied. Present standards or guidelines do not specifically address this problem and use threshold levels and methods to define safe exposure conditions that cannot apply to reveal high specific absorption rate (SAR) gradients, such as the ones generated by thin metallic implanted objects. In particular, an averaging mass of 10g, typically used for SAR calculation to evaluate the effect of RF exposure of biological tissues, is too big if compared to the SAR gradient generated by thin metallic structures. The SAR estimation according to this method cannot be considered a reliable indicator to evaluate the potential damage due to the RF induced heating at the interface between the implant and biological tissues. Five wires of different lengths and thicknesses were simulated and the SAR at the wire tip was evaluated over 10g, 1g, 0.1g averaging mass: the SAR underestimation related to the 10g and 1 g masses, compared to 0.1g mass, was greater than 90% and 60%, respectively. In conclusion, the present standard cannot be applied to thin metallic implants. The amount of averaging mass should be chosen as a function of the dimension of the implanted object and of the SAR gradient that is generated around it. At the same time, the averaging volume has to be not too small to be just a single “hot spot”, not relevant for the evaluation of potential tissue damage due to RF exposure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call