Abstract
In this study, erosion patterns and magnitude are compared between the outputs of 2D and 3D CFD models in contraction and expansion geometries. ANSYS Fluent software was used to model a circular cross-section geometry with a contraction and the results were compared to published experimental data. The simulation findings showed that there is good agreement between the 2D and 3D CFD models and the experimental data in terms of fluid flow properties such as velocity profiles and magnitude. It also demonstrated that the 2D and 3D CFD models' representations of erosion patterns and magnitudes are equivalent. The 3D CFD simulations were able to provide more information than the 2D CFD simulations, particularly in terms of erosion distribution over the entire geometry.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
