Abstract
There are several kinds of numerical techniques for solving option valuation problems. In this article Binomial model (BM) and Crank-Nicolson finite difference (CNFD) approach are applied and compared with the Black-Scholes analytic solution (BSAS) to determine the best numerical method. It has been noticed that, for the valuation of European call (EC) options at various factors, the Binomial model (BM) is found to be more accurate than the Crank-Nicolson finite difference (CNFD) technique. In addition, for the impact of high volatility, the technique of Crank-Nicolson finite difference (CNFD) approaches quicker to Black-Scholes analytic solution (BSAS) than the Binomial model (BM). Furthermore, in comparison to the Binomial model (BM), CNFD method consumes more time to determine the option price in each time step.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
