Abstract

This paper presents a finite element analysis of the small punch creep test for 316L(N), which is compared with experimental data for 650 and 700 °C. Special emphasis is placed on (i) assessing the influence of friction and (ii) comparing two different creep models: the simple Norton creep and the more general creep model. The computed normalized deflection rate versus time is almost identical for all cases, which allows for scaling of the results. The computed time to rupture increases linearly with the friction coefficient due to a reduction in the mean stress. There is a good overall agreement between the experimental values and the computed deflection rate for a friction coefficient of around 0.3. It is shown that the initial reduction in deflection rate is due to stress relaxation and homogenization, and is only marginally affected by primary creep hardening. The computed results are compared with the equivalent stress and strain rates in the recently published small punch standard (EN 10371). The computed von Mises stresses at minimum deflection decrease linearly with the friction coefficient but are consistently slightly higher than the equivalent stress in the standard. For the strain rates, the computed values are significantly higher than the equivalent values in the standard. The presented simulations give a deeper insight of the small punch creep and impact of key parameters such the friction coefficient and in general as a guidance to refinement and improvement of the empirically based formulae in the standard.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIn the small punch creep test (SPC) a disc, with a typical diameter and thickness of 8 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively, is loaded by an indenter with a spherical tip under constant load

  • Important relationships established for uniaxial creep tests and used in creep design, such as the Monkman–Grant and Larsson–Miller relationships, follow from the small punch creep test by replacing the stress and strain rate in the uniaxial test with the force and deflection rate in the SPC test e.g., [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]

  • The smalland punch creep machines thread clamping system pressing the sample between the upper lower die

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the small punch creep test (SPC) a disc, with a typical diameter and thickness of 8 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively, is loaded by an indenter with a spherical tip under constant load. Important relationships established for uniaxial creep tests and used in creep design, such as the Monkman–Grant (linear loglog for time to rupture vs deflection/rate) and Larsson–Miller relationships (linear loglog force versus time to rupture), follow from the small punch creep test by replacing the stress and strain rate in the uniaxial test with the force and deflection rate in the SPC test e.g., [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call