A numerical and experimental approach to compare the effect of sample thickness in small in-situ SEM and large ex-situ tensile testing in Alloy 709

Abstract

ASTM standards for tensile tests define specific sample size requirements regardless of grain size of the material. However, sample size requirements for testing should be considered in conjunction with the number of grains within its reduced cross-sectional area. This is particularly important for in-situ Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) tensile tests, as they have to be conducted on smaller samples. In this study, a comprehensive experimental and numerical evaluation of the effect of specimen thickness (and the resulting number of grains within the cross-section) were conducted using in-situ SEM tensile test (on sub-millimeter thick samples) and ex-situ tensile tests (on samples of 0.68–5.9 mm thickness) and the results are compared with FEM simulations outcome. All tests were conducted at room temperature and the results are correlated to the number of grains within the thickness of specimens. The tensile test results indicated that even though the 0.2% proof stress and the tensile strength do not vary for the current range of thicknesses (with number of grains in the cross-section varying from 13 to 118), a difference in necking mechanism exists. Post tensile strength, thinner samples undergo more shear failure and diagonal localized necking whereas thicker samples experience more diffuse necking indicated by decreased area of shear failure at the edges and increased area of dimpled tensile failure at the center of the sample. FEM results complement the experimental findings by showing the formation of conjugated localized shear bands on the upper and lower surface in the 0.68 mm thick sample and shear bands combining to form singular shear bands in thicker samples. These results also confirm the validity of the in-situ SEM tensile tests conducted on thinner samples as long as the required minimum number of grains exist within the cross-section.