A novel test system for detection of tick repellents

Abstract

AbstractA bioassay was developed to examine the response of ticks towards potential repellents that may protect vertebrates against tick bites. Such tick repellents must be effective despite the unavoidable presence of various attractive host‐derived stimuli. Therefore, a moving‐object‐bioassay (MO‐bioassay) was developed that mimicks body warmth and movement of vertebrates by a rotating and heated drum. Compounds which were tested for their effects on ticks were applied onto a small elevated area of the drum. Ticks were allowed to approach the drum by walking on a glass rod which ended ≈1 mm away from the local elevation. Ticks could cling to this elevation that intermittently passed by, whereas the remaining drum surface was too far away from the tip of the rod to be contacted by the ticks.Without the presence of any repellents, 85.5% of 600 hungry, field‐collected Ixodes ricinus nymphs moved to the heated, rotating drum within 2 min. Further experiments with unfed I. ricinus nymphs were performed to test whether one established and two potential tick repellents elicit an avoidance reaction in the ticks despite the proven attractiveness of the drum. Freshly applied DEET (N,N‐diethyl‐m‐toluamide) at a concentration of 0.11 mg cm−2 proved active as a repellent in the MO‐bioassay over a distance of a few mm as well as by direct contact. A similar repellent effect was observed with (−)‐myrtenal at 1 mg cm−2, but not at 0.1 mg cm−2, indicating that this terpenaldehyde is a weaker repellent for I. ricinus nymphs than DEET. No repellent effect was observed with camphor (0.1 mg cm−2).The MO‐bioassay thus is a rapid, simple and low‐cost test method allowing the investigation of tick host‐contact behaviour as well as the screening of candidate repellents which are either perceived as volatiles or via contact chemoreception.