Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose a novel one-leg standardised rebound side-hop test (SRSH) specifically designed for detailed analysis of landing mechanics. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed persons (ACLR, n = 30) and healthy-knee controls (CTRL, n = 30) were tested for within-session and test-retest (CTRL only, n = 25) reliability and agreement. Trunk, hip and knee angles and moments in sagittal, frontal, and transversal planes during landing, including time to stabilisation (TTS), were evaluated using intra-class correlations (ICCs), average within-person standard deviations (SW) and minimal differences. Excellent within-session reliability were found for angles in both groups (most ICCs > 0.90, SW ≤ 5°), and excellent to good for moments (most ICCs > 0.80, SW ≤ 0.34 Nm/kg). Only knee internal rotation moment showed poor reliability (ICC < 0.4). Test-retest results were excellent to fair for all angles and moments (ICCs 0.47–0.91, SW < 5° and ≤ 0.25 Nm/kg), except for peak trunk lateral bending angle and knee internal rotation moment. TTS showed excellent to fair within-session reliability but poor test-retest results. These results, with a few exceptions, suggest promising potential of evaluating landing mechanics during the SRSH for ACLR and CTRL, and emphasise the importance of joint-specific movement control variables in standardised tasks.

Highlights

  • Three-dimensional (3D) analysis for increased understanding of movement control in relation to sports injury rehabilitation is increasingly used in research and clinics

  • At least 22 participants per group were needed in test-retest analyses to achieve an intra-class correlations (ICCs) of 0.8 as previously shown for the same angles and moments (Alenezi et al, 2016; Marshall et al, 2014; Mok et al, 2018) that differ from an ICC of ACL reconstruction (ACLR)† (n = 30)

  • Within-session reliability Within-session reliability for ACLR was excellent for all angles, except for trunk lateral bending at IC (ICC = 0.74), and excellent for 10 of 12 moments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) analysis for increased understanding of movement control in relation to sports injury rehabilitation is increasingly used in research and clinics. The purposes are often to evaluate consequences of injuries (Oberländer, Brüggemann, Höher, & Karamanidis, 2013), to inform and monitor rehabilitation (Chua et al, 2016), or to provide guidelines for sports injury prevention (Kristianslund & Krosshaug, 2013; Taylor, Ford, Nguyen, & Shultz, 2016). Such measures are, seldom evaluated for reliability and agreement, which is imperative for their usefulness.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call