Abstract

Rainfall-Runoff simulation is the backbone of all hydrological and climate change studies. This study proposes a novel stochastic model for daily rainfall-runoff simulation called Stacked Long Short-Term Memory (SLSTM) relying on machine learning technology. The SLSTM model utilizes only the rainfall-runoff data in its modelling approach and the hydrology system is deemed a blackbox. Conversely, the distributed and physically-based hydrological models, e.g., SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) preserve the physical aspect of hydrological variables and their inter-relations while taking a wide range of data. The two model types provide specific applications that interest modelers, who can apply them according to their project specification and objectives. However, sparse distribution of point-data may hinder physical models’ performance, which may not be the case in data-driven models. This study proposes a specific SLSTM model and investigates the SLSTM and SWAT models’ data dependency in terms of their spatial distribution. The study was conducted in the two distinct river basins of Samarahan and Trusan, Malaysia, with over 20 years of hydro-climate data. The Trusan basin’s rain gauges are scattered downstream of the basin outlet and Samarahan’s are located around the basin, with one station within each basin’s limits. The SWAT was developed and calibrated following its general modelling approach, however, the SLSTM performance was also tested using data preprocessing with principal component analysis (PCA). Results showed that the SWAT performance for daily streamflow simulation at Samarahan has been superior to that of Trusan. Both the SLSTM and PCA-SLSTM models, however, showed better performance at Trusan with PCA-SLSTM outperforming the SLSTM. This demonstrates that the SWAT model is greatly affected by the spatial distribution of its input data, while data-driven models, irrespective of the spatial distribution of their entry data, can perform well if the data adequacy condition is met. However, considering the structural difference between the two models, each has its specific application in a water resources context. The study of catchments’ response to changes in the hydrology cycle requires a physically-based model like SWAT with proper spatial and temporal distribution of its entry data. However, the study of a specific phenomenon without considering the underlying processes can be done using data-driven models like SLSTM, where improper spatial distribution of data cannot be a restricting factor.

Highlights

  • The calibration and validation of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model were performed for both river basins

  • Calibration using the SUFI-2 method in the SWAT-CUP computing package is performed based on the parameters that have a high impact on the model output

  • The selection of parameters is an essential step because some parameters in SWAT hinder the possibility of manual calibration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

River flow estimation is an important factor in designing water infrastructures built for applications such as flood control, urban water supply [1,2], and irrigation network. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13384 design [3]. Hydrological models fall into three main categories of physically-based, conceptual, and data-driven models. The physically-based models represent the physical description of the hydrological processes governing the basin’s responses in the hydrology cycle. Conceptual models are based on the empirically observed relationships between different hydrological parameters. The data-driven models are built on the system state variables, such as input and output, and do not require in-depth knowledge of hydrological processes [4,5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call