Abstract

BackgroundSweet taste receptor is expressed not only in taste buds but also in nongustatory organs such as enteroendocrine cells and pancreatic beta-cells, and may play more extensive physiological roles in energy metabolism. Here we examined the expression and function of the sweet taste receptor in 3T3-L1 cells.Methodology/Principal FindingsIn undifferentiated preadipocytes, both T1R2 and T1R3 were expressed very weakly, whereas the expression of T1R3 but not T1R2 was markedly up-regulated upon induction of differentiation (by 83.0 and 3.8-fold, respectively at Day 6). The α subunits of Gs (Gαs) and G14 (Gα14) but not gustducin were expressed throughout the differentiation process. The addition of sucralose or saccharin during the first 48 hours of differentiation considerably reduced the expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα at Day 2, the expression of aP2 at Day 4 and triglyceride accumulation at Day 6. These anti-adipogenic effects were attenuated by short hairpin RNA-mediated gene-silencing of T1R3. In addition, overexpression of the dominant-negative mutant of Gαs but not YM-254890, an inhibitor of Gα14, impeded the effects of sweeteners, suggesting a possible coupling of Gs with the putative sweet taste-sensing receptor. In agreement, sucralose and saccharin increased the cyclic AMP concentration in differentiating 3T3-L1 cells and also in HEK293 cells heterologously expressing T1R3. Furthermore, the anti-adipogenic effects of sweeteners were mimicked by Gs activation with cholera toxin but not by adenylate cyclase activation with forskolin, whereas small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of Gαs had the opposite effects.Conclusions3T3-L1 cells express a functional sweet taste-sensing receptor presumably as a T1R3 homomer, which mediates the anti-adipogenic signal by a Gs-dependent but cAMP-independent mechanism.

Highlights

  • 3T3-L1 cells express a functional sweet taste-sensing receptor presumably as a T1R3 homomer, which mediates the anti-adipogenic signal by a Gs-dependent but cAMP-independent mechanism

  • The sweet taste receptor expressed in taste receptor cells of taste buds consists of two members of the T1R family class C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), T1R2 and T1R3 [1], that are characterized by a large extracellular venus flytrap domain (VFD) linked to a canonical 7-transmembrane domain (TMD) via a short cysteine-rich domain (CRD)

  • While the precise signaling mechanisms downstream of the sweet taste receptor has yet to be fully defined, one accepted signal transduction cascade is that the T1R2 and T1R3 heterodimer is coupled with gustducin, a heterotrimeric G protein expressed selectively in taste receptor cells, which activates phospholipase Cb2 (PLCb2) resulting in the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate into inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The sweet taste receptor expressed in taste receptor (type II) cells of taste buds consists of two members of the T1R family class C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), T1R2 and T1R3 [1], that are characterized by a large extracellular venus flytrap domain (VFD) linked to a canonical 7-transmembrane domain (TMD) via a short cysteine-rich domain (CRD). Gustducin or TRPM5 knockout mice are not completely unresponsive to sweet compounds [7,8,9] These observations have suggested that other undefined sweet taste-sensing receptor(s) and signal transduction mechanisms may exist for recognition of sweet stimuli. We examined the expression and function of the sweet taste receptor in 3T3-L1 cells

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call