Abstract

SummaryThe spindle checkpoint is a surveillance system acting in mitosis to delay anaphase onset until all chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindle [1, 2]. When the checkpoint is activated, the Mad2 and Mad3 proteins directly bind and inhibit Cdc20, which is an essential activator of an E3 ubiquitin ligase known as the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) [3]. When the checkpoint is satisfied, Cdc20-APC is activated and polyubiquitinates securin and cyclin, leading to the dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion and mitotic progression. Several protein kinases play critical roles in spindle checkpoint signaling, but the mechanism (or mechanisms) by which they inhibit mitotic progression remains unclear [4]. Furthermore, it is not known whether their activity needs to be reversed by protein phosphatases before anaphase onset can occur. Here we employ fission yeast to show that Aurora (Ark1) kinase activity is directly required to maintain spindle checkpoint arrest, even in the presence of many unattached kinetochores. Upon Ark1 inhibition, checkpoint complexes are disassembled and cyclin B is rapidly degraded. Importantly, checkpoint silencing and cyclin B degradation require the kinetochore-localized isoform of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1Dis2). We propose that PP1Dis2-mediated dephosphorylation of checkpoint components forms a novel spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism.

Highlights

  • Aurora Kinase Activity Is Required for the Maintenance of Spindle Checkpoint Arrest in the Absence of Microtubules The role of Aurora kinases in checkpoint signaling remains controversial [5, 6]

  • These studies argue that Aurora B has an indirect role in the spindle checkpoint

  • Two reports have argued that Aurora B activity is required to respond to unattached kinetochores in Xenopus [11] and fission yeast [12]

Read more

Summary

A Novel Protein Phosphatase 1-Dependent Spindle Checkpoint Silencing Mechanism

Citation for published version: Vanoosthuyse, V & Hardwick, KG 2009, 'A Novel Protein Phosphatase 1-Dependent Spindle Checkpoint Silencing Mechanism', Current Biology, vol 19, no. Hardwick1,* 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK

Summary
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Experimental Procedures
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.