Abstract

Vegetation variable retrieval from reflectance data is typically grouped into three categories: the statistical–empirical category, the physical category and the hybrid category (physical models applied to statistical models). Based on the similarities between the spectra of leaves in the optical domain, the leaf reflectance spectra can be linearly modelled using a very limited number of principal components (PCs) if the PCA (principal component analysis) transformation is carried out at the sample dimension. In this paper, we present a novel data-driven approach that uses the PCA transformation to reconstruct leaf reflectance spectra and also to retrieve leaf biochemical contents. First, the PCA transformation was carried out on a training dataset simulated by the PROSPECT-5 model. The results showed that the leaf reflectance spectra can be accurately reconstructed using only a few leading PCs, as the ten leading PCs contained 99.999% of the total information in the 3636 training samples. The spectral error between the simulated or measured reflectance and the reconstructed spectra was also investigated using the simulated and measured datasets (ANGERS and LOPEX’93). The mean root mean squared error (RMSE) values varied from 5.56 × 10−5 to 6.18 × 10−3, which is about 3–10 times more accurate than the PROSPECT simulation method for measured datasets. Secondly, the relationship between PCs and leaf biochemical components was investigated, and we found that the PCs are closely related to the leaf biochemical components and to the reflectance spectra. Only when the weighting coefficient of the most sensitive PC was employed to retrieve the leaf biochemical contents, the coefficients of determination for the PCA data-driven model were 0.69, 0.99, 0.94 and 0.68 for the specific leaf weight (SLW), equivalent water thickness (EWT), chlorophyll content (Cab) and carotenoid content (Car), respectively. Finally, statistical models for the retrieval of leaf biochemical contents were developed based on the weighting coefficients of the sensitive PCs, and the PCA data-driven models were validated and compared to the traditional VI-based and physically-based approaches for the retrieval of leaf properties. The results show that the PCA method shows similar or better performance in the estimation of leaf biochemical contents. Therefore, the PCA method provides a new and accurate data-driven method for reconstructing leaf reflectance spectra and also for retrieving leaf biochemical contents.

Highlights

  • Remote sensing of canopy biophysical variables is important in many applications ranging from precision agriculture [1,2] to global assessments of the carbon and nutrient cycles [3,4,5]

  • Vegetation variable retrievals from remote sensing data are typically grouped in three categories: the statistical–empirical category, the physical category, and the hybrid category [5,6,7]

  • The results show that: The leaf reflectance spectra can be accurately linearly reconstructed using only a few leading principal components (PCs), with the ten leading PCs accounting for 99.998% of the total information contained in the 3636 training data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Remote sensing of canopy biophysical variables is important in many applications ranging from precision agriculture [1,2] to global assessments of the carbon and nutrient cycles [3,4,5]. Vegetation variable retrievals from remote sensing data are typically grouped in three categories: the statistical–empirical category, the physical category, and the hybrid category (physical models applied to statistical models) [5,6,7]. The main limitation of using RTMs is the ill-posed nature of the model inversion which arises because different combinations of leaf parameters may correspond to very similar spectra [30]. This makes the choice of the initial parameter values important, and some regularization of the inverse problem may be required, implying the use of a priori knowledge to constrain the inversion process [30,34]. Numerous methods were presented to collect ground-based measurements, while there may be some differences and uncertainties among these methods even for one variable, such as leaf area index (LAI) [44,45,46]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.