Abstract

Comparing probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) is quite essential in solving PLTS-expressed multi-attribute group decision-making problems (PLTS-MAGDM). Researchers have designed various comparison measures to obtain the rank of PLTSs. However, most of the existing PLTS comparison measures need additional tedious adjustments before conducting a specific computation. Besides, these measures do not adequately consider the effects of the semantics of the basic linguistic term set and the probabilistic distributions. This paper proposes a new preference degree for g-granularity probabilistic term sets (g-GPLTSs) to overcome the two shortcomings simultaneously by integrating the effect from basic linguistic terms and probabilistic distributions without any adjustment. Moreover, the g-GPLTS preference degree also shows the extended adaptability for comparing PLTSs with unbalanced semantics. Based on the newly proposed preference degree, we construct a useful min-conflict model to solve PLTS-MAGDM with a large number of experts expressing the three-way primary grading. Finally, an illustrative example concerning software supplier selections, followed by the comparative analysis, is presented to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call