A novel predictor in endovascular treatment patients for cerebral perfusion and prognosis: CHA2DS2-VASC

Abstract

ObjectiveThrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction(TICI) score is used to objectively evaluate cerebral perfusion after intervention in acute stroke with mechanical thrombectomy. In our study, we aimed to compare the results of patients with successful TICI perfusion score (TICI ≥ 2c) with the results of patients with poor TICI perfusion score (TICI < 2c) and to investigate the relationship of the CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system with the final TICI perfusion score and other endpoints. MethodsFor this retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study, 278 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy were screened consecutively by the interventional neurology department of hospital. The primary endpoint of the study was in-hospital and 1-year all-cause death. All patients underwent cranial imaging to evaluate hemorrhagic transformation after the procedure. ResultsIt was observed that CHA2DS2-VASc score was significantly higher in the poor cerebral perfusion group than in the succesful cerebral perfusion group (3.19 ± 1.8 vs 2.72 ± 1.73, p = 0.046). According to Kaplan Meier's analysis, a significant difference was observed in the group with a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 2.5 in terms of all-cause mortality at follow-up compared to the group with a low CHA2DS2-VASc score (p = 0.002). According to Kaplan Meier's analysis, a significant difference was observed in the group with a poor TICI score compared to the group with a succesful one in terms of all-cause mortality at follow-up (p < 0.001). Cox regression model showed that poor TICI score group, Age ≥ 75 years, lower glomerular filtariton rate (GFR), higher high-sensitiveC-reactiveprotein (Hs-CRP), and higher admission NIHSS score were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality. ConclusionHigh CHA2DS2-VASc score has been shown to be a predictor of unsuccessful cerebral perfusion score and 1-year mortality after mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients. As a result of our research, it has been shown that complete or nearly complete reperfusion has more positive results than partial reperfusion.