Abstract

The type of criterion weight can be distinguished according to different decision methods. Subjective weights are given by decision makers based on their knowledge, experience, expertise, and other factors. Objective weights are obtained through multi-step calculations of the evaluation matrix constructed from the actual information about the evaluation criteria of the alternatives. A single consideration of these two types of weights often results in biased results. In addition, in order to build an effective supply chain source, buyers must find suitable quality products and/or service providers in the process of supplier selection. Based on the above reasons, it is difficult to accurately select the appropriate alternative. The main contribution of this paper is to combine entropy weight, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) weight, and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method into a suitable multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) solution. The TOPSIS method is extended with entropy-AHP weights, and entropy-AHP weights are used instead of subjective weights. A novel decision-making model of TOPSIS integrated entropy-AHP weights is proposed to select the appropriate supplier. Finally, we take the selection of building material suppliers as an example and use sensitivity analysis to show that the combination of the TOPSIS method based on entropy-AHP weights can effectively select the appropriate supplier.

Highlights

  • The decision-making process usually needs to consider multiple criteria at the same time, and requires multiple standard technologies to assist decision making

  • In order to choose a suitable building material supplier, we propose a novel decision-making model of the TOPSIS integrated entropy-analytic hierarchy process (AHP) weight

  • TOPSIS can be obtained, which can appropriately replace subjective weight value set by decision ofinTOPSIS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The decision-making process usually needs to consider multiple criteria at the same time, and requires multiple standard technologies to assist decision making. Chain management (SCM) is mainly to improve competitiveness, optimize business processes, cycle and inventory levels, maximize revenue and profitability, reduce manufacturing costs, improve customer satisfaction, and meet consumer services [3,4,5,6,7,8]. In the decision-making method of supply chain management, especially in some complex areas, certain criteria need to be defined in advance. In the early stages of the supply chain, choosing the most favorable supplier is one of the most important tasks [9]. Academia and practice have focused extensively on supply chain management in recent years

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call