Abstract

In this study, using natural gas as the feedstock, a new scheme – a chemical looping combustion system with a moving bed reducer, coupled with the steam methane reforming (MCLC-SMR), is proposed and simulated for hydrogen production. This suggested process configuration is compared with other hydrogen production systems including the fluidized bed chemical looping combustion system coupled with the steam methane reforming (FCLC-SMR), the chemical looping partial oxidation system combined with the water-gas-shift reaction (CLPO-WGS), the 3-reactor chemical looping system for hydrogen generation (CLHG-3R), the conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) and auto-thermal reforming (ATR) systems with CO2 capture. The simulation results indicate that the particle circulation rate in MCLC-SMR is 64% less than in FCLC-SMR. MCLC-SMR also shows the best system performance regarding cold gas efficiency (79%) and effective thermal efficiency (75%). The economic assessment indicates that MCLC-SMR can achieve the lowest levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of $1.34/kg at 30 ton/hr H2 production capacity, and CLHG-3R can achieve the lowest LCOH of $2.06/kg at 1 ton/hr H2 production capacity among the six hydrogen production methods. At 30 ton/hr H2 production capacity, the chemical looping reactors in MCLC-SMR are 37% cheaper than in FCLC-SMR. The sensitivity analysis also indicates that MCLC-SMR remains the most economical hydrogen production method over a wide range of price parameters (the prices of particles, chemical looping reactors, natural gas, and electricity).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call