A novel method of subxiphoid video-assisted thoracic surgery for thymectomy.

Abstract

BackgroundWith advances in thoracoscopic surgical instruments and techniques, subxiphoid video-assisted thoracic surgery (S-VATS) has become the main approach for anterior mediastinal tumor resection under thoracoscopy. However, the drawbacks of S-VATS, including it being a relatively unfixed surgical procedure, make it complicated and difficult for unexperienced surgeons to master.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed and analyzed consecutive patients with anterior mediastinal tumor or myasthenia gravis (MG) who underwent S-VATS at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China, between March 2015 and April 2019.Patients were divided into the conventional group and the “four-zone one-way” group. Intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared between the groups. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was applied to determine the operation time (OT)-learning curve of the S-VATS “four-zone one-way” method.ResultsA total of 82 patients were included in this analysis, of which, 40 patients underwent the conventional method of S-VATS and 42 patients underwent the “four-zone one-way” method. Patients in the “four-zone one-way” group had significantly shorter OT (138.50±29.43 and 118.00±28.18 minutes, respectively; P=0.002) and significantly less blood loss (36.00±20.16 and 23.92±14.96 mL, respectively; P=0.003) compared with patients in the conventional group. Our data indicated that there was no difference of the efficacy of MG treatment between the 2 groups. The difference in the preoperative and postoperative quantitative MG scoring system score (QMG-score) and the dose reduction of cholinesterase inhibitors was comparable between patients in the 2 groups. According to the CUSUM analysis curve, after a steady improvement over phase I (cases 1–12 for the traditional method and cases 1–5 for the “four-zone one-way” method), the surgical procedure could be mastered. Phase III occurred after case 26 in the traditional group and case 28 in the “four-zone one-way” group, and is characterized by rapid improvements.ConclusionsCompared with the conventional method of S-VATS, the “four-zone one-way” method significantly decreased OT and estimated blood loss. These results demonstrated the feasibility and safety of the “four-zone one-way” method of S-VATS.