Abstract

IntroductionFor a broad variety of innovation intelligence tasks, like finding the patent agent being specialised in a technology, specialisation profiles of entities are of particular interest. Such a profile indicates for each entity in which activities it is markedly specialised. Conventional approaches suffer two shortcomings, though. First, they tend to consider only the activity profiles of the respective entities, while neglecting information about all other entities' activities. Second, they often lack in considering entity specific characteristics, when assigning an activity to an entity's specialisation profile or not. MethodTo address these shortcomings, we introduce the RSI-specialisation, a novel method for retrieving dichotomous and idiotypic specialisation profiles. Operationalising relative specialisation, the novel method is rooted in the theory of comparative advantage. In order to contrast it with the approaches based on absolute specialisation, it is compared with the baseline method ENF- specialisation, which has its theoretical roots in the concept of effective number of components. AnalysisBoth methods are demonstrated by applying them to the case of the specialisation of patent agent firms. RSI-specialisation and ENF-specialisation are applied to a data set containing all EPO patent applications in 2014 and 2015. ResultsCompared to the baseline approach, the RSI-specialisation reduces noise from market effects to a greater satisfaction. Besides being less dependent on agent size and market structure, it reduces interpretation to the most essential question for an applicant, i.e. why he should opt for one rather than another provider. In addition, it also guarantees that a potential applicant can find in any field a specialised patent agent firm. ConclusionWe find that the novel RSI-specialisation promises to be a robust and reliable method for retrieving dichotomous and idiotypic specialisation profiles. Patent agent firms aside, it could be applied to a multitude of different domains, like the specialisation of other professional workers, of politicians, experts in consulting firms or even to users in online-shops and patients in clinical trials.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.