Abstract
<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is important in proton therapy. Although a large amount of in vitro cell experimental data exists for various linear energy transfers (LETs) and various cell lines, it is difficult to derive a reliable RBE model from these data using the classic linear-quadratic (LQ) model, mainly because its parameters, α<sub>LQ</sub> and β<sub>LQ</sub>, have no clear mechanistic correlation with LET. In this study, we hypothesize that a mechanistic model with parameters directly relate to LET can be developed to replace the LQ model for cell survival description, and it would be better than the LQ model for RBE model derivation. The 2 parameters in the model are α<sub>M</sub>, which represents the ability to generate cell damage and may linearly increase with LET, and β<sub>M</sub>, which represents the ability to repair cell damage and may linearly decrease with LET (because higher LET generates more clustered DNA damages, which are difficult to repair). <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> We used the number of unit damages to score the severity of radiation-generated damage in a cell. Assuming that a dose of D generated an average number of α<sub>M</sub>*D unit damages, the probability of cells having n (n = 0, 1, 2, ...m) unit damages was thus determined using the Poisson Equation, P(n) = [(α<sub>M</sub>D)<sup>n</sup>/n!]*exp(-α<sub>M</sub>D). We further assumed that a cell with n unit damages has a probability of β<sub>M</sub><sup>n</sup> to be repaired, and cells having 4 or more unit damages would not be repaired. Thus, the survival fraction of cells after a dose of D was derived as SF(D) = [1+α<sub>M</sub>β<sub>M</sub>D+(α<sub>M</sub>β<sub>M</sub>D)<sup>2</sup>/2+(α<sub>M</sub>β<sub>M</sub>D)<sup>3</sup>/6]*exp(-α<sub>M</sub>D). A total of 47 experimental cell survival datasets for 3 cell lines in the literature were used to test this mechanistic model. Correlations of α<sub>M</sub> and β<sub>M</sub> with LET were determined in terms of RBE<sub>α</sub> and RBE<sub>β</sub>, which is the ratio of α<sub>M</sub> (or β<sub>M</sub>) in proton and photon. A RBE model was consequently derived. <h3>Results</h3> The mechanistic model fitted well with all experimental data, similar as the LQ model. Interestingly, for two cell lines with pristine proton beam data, both α<sub>M</sub> and β<sub>M</sub> were perfect linear functions of LET, with R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98∼1.0. On the other hand, the linearity was greatly degraded for the corresponding spread-out Bragg Peak (SOBP) data, with same data points deviating at same directions for 2 cell lines, suggesting that the LET values calculated in SOBP were not as accurate as pristine beam. For the 3<sup>rd</sup> cell line with majority data points of SOBP beams, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89∼0.91. The correlation of α<sub>M</sub> and β<sub>M</sub> with LET were expressed as RBE<sub>α</sub> = 1.1+k<sub>α</sub>*LET and RBE<sub>β</sub> = 1.0-k<sub>β</sub>*LET, where k<sub>α</sub> = 0.018, 0.009 and 0.005, k<sub>β</sub> = 0.031, 0.028, and 0.027 for 3 cell lines, respectively. A RBE model depending on LET, dose and cell type (represented by α<sub>M</sub> and β<sub>M</sub> in photon) was finally derived. <h3>Conclusion</h3> A mechanistic cell survival model was developed and it appeared to have advantage over the LQ model in deriving a reliable RBE model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.