Abstract

Background: CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing is one of the risks associated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV), possibly contributing to failure. In a bench study, we showed that a novel mask design, with separate limbs for inflow and outflow gases, significantly reduced CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing in different ventilation settings. Objectives: The study aimed to test whether a new mask design could 1) reduce CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing in healthy volunteers during NIV (phase 1) and 2) reduce minute ventilation (phase 2). Materials and Methods: Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to NIV using two masks in a crossover design: a traditional single-limb mask for inflow and outflow gases and a mask with two separated limbs. In phase 1, six ventilation settings were tested for each mask: CPAP (PEEP 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) and pressure support ventilation (PSV, PS Level 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) using a mechanical ventilator with a bias flow of 8 or 20 L/min; free-flow CPAP (PEEP 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) with 60 or 90 L/min of gas flow. A nasal cannula was inserted in one nostril of the volunteers and connected to a CO<sub>2</sub> gas analyzer to measure CO<sub>2</sub> during the respiratory cycle. In phase 2, volunteers underwent a prolonged time of ventilation in CPAP 90 L/min and PSV with 20 L/min of bias flow. During free-flow CPAP, electrical impedance tomography was used to record the change in impedance during tidal breathing and then estimate tidal volume. Results: Ten healthy adults were enrolled in phase 1, and 8 volunteers in phase 2. CO<sub>2</sub> during inspiration was significantly lower in each setting with the two-limb versus the one-limb mask (p < 0.001). The maximum CO<sub>2</sub> reduction was observed in the continuous-flow CPAP settings. EtCO<sub>2</sub> was lower with the two-limb mask compared to the one-limb mask (p < 0.001). However, no difference in minute ventilation was observed between the two masks. Conclusion: The new mask design with two ports for inhaled and exhaled gases reduced the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing in all tested ventilation settings. The CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing reduction did not decrease minute ventilation in healthy volunteers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.