Abstract

Estuarine environments are highly heterogeneous habitats where numerous organisms interact with each other. Aquaculture systems encompass such interactions, and the eventual yields depend on how the cultivated species respond to the environmental heterogeneity. Marine mussels are calcifying organisms that rely on calcium carbonate shell and byssus filaments secreted during their lifetime to protect soft vital tissues against aggressive, hydrodynamic environments and the actions of predators and competitors. Nevertheless, these protective structures can be energetically costly, depending on the environment, thus affecting the energy allocation patterns in the organism. Consequently, other important fitness parameters for the aquaculture industry, such as soft tissue condition and market value, may also be affected. Here, we present a spatial and temporal analysis of the protective and fitness responses in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis with the aim of obtaining a better understanding of the inter-location variability in survival and performance and the corresponding main environmental drivers. A novel, intuitive ecological index that measures the impact of both protective and fitness strategies was developed and is discussed in relation to cultivation timing. The data presented provides the basis for understanding the natural variability in energetic requirements for different vital tissues in bivalve mollusk that support survival and growth. We report the scientific basis for management actions aimed to shortening the cultivation cycle in the aquaculture sector. These actions are based on the combined use of the PROFIT index and other aquaculture practices (e.g. modifying density). PROFIT helps to identify when the quality of the product, understood as PROtection and FITness strategies, would be best suited for the market. Highlights: - PROFIT is a novel, simple eco-physiological index for use in the cultivation of marine mussels - Consideration of protective tissues and yield in cultivated marine bivalves is needed for better comprehension of energetic trade-offs during the life cycle - Innovations in aquaculture practices, here with the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis as a case study, should consider new indicators like PROFIT (and others) for better management of the natural resource and for differentiating production areas or exploitation methods

Highlights

  • The morphology and performance of bivalve mollusks in general, and marine mussels in particular, are known to vary in relation to key environmental factors for different species and habitats (Bergström and Lindegarth, 2016; Kroeker et al, 2016; Telesca et al, 2018)

  • The discharges from the Rivers Ulla and Umia were significant throughout the winter and spring of 2016 (Table 1) and occurred in three pulses that reached maximum continental inputs of around 400 m3 s−1 in February (Figure 2a)

  • The aim of this study was to relate a number of field responses in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis, linking individual performance, understood as the capacity to withstand natural threats

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The morphology and performance of bivalve mollusks in general, and marine mussels in particular, are known to vary in relation to key environmental factors for different species and habitats (Bergström and Lindegarth, 2016; Kroeker et al, 2016; Telesca et al, 2018). As well as producing calcified shells, many marine bivalves (especially those in the family Mytilidae) secrete byssus, a non-calcified extracellular tissue. This attachment-related tissue confers the individuals the ability to maintain a relatively sessile life mode and contributes to their successful cultivation around the world. As animals can modify energy allocation to protective tissues, energetic trade-offs between soft and hard (byssus filaments and shell) tissues production can occasionally occur (Carrington, 2002; Moeser et al, 2006; Zardi et al, 2007; Babarro and Carrington, 2011). Byssus and shell secretion may represent up to 8–15% and 25–50% respectively of the total energy expenditure in mussels (Hawkins and Bayne, 1985; Gardner and Thomas, 1987; Steffani and Branch, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.