Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to verify the veracity and reliability of the INCNS score for prediction of neurological ICU (NICU) mortality and 3-month functional outcome and mortality in comatose patients.Methods: In this prospective study, data of the patients admitted to NICU from January 2013 to January 2019 were collected for validation. The 3-month functional outcomes were evaluated using modified Rankin Scale (mRS). By using the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis, we compared the INCNS score with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Full Outline of Un-Responsiveness Score (FOUR) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) for assessment of the predictive performance of these scales for 3-month functional outcome and mortality and NICU mortality performed at 24- and 72-h after admission to the NICU.Results: Totally 271 patients were used for evaluation; the INCNS score achieved an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.766 (95% CI: 0.711–0.815) and 0.824 (95% CI: 0.774–0.868) for unfavorable functional outcomes, an AUC of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.800–0.889) and 0.892 (95% CI: 0.848–0.926) for NICU mortality, and an AUC of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.760–0.856) and 0.832 (95% CI: 0.782–0.874) for the 3-month mortality after discharge from the NICU at 24- and 72-h. The INCNS score exhibited a significantly better predictive performance of mortality and 3-month functional outcomes than FOUR and GCS. There was no significant difference in predicting NICU mortality and 3-month functional outcomes between INCNS and APACHE II, but INCNS had better predictive performance of 3-month mortality than APACHE II.Conclusions: The INCNS score could be used for predicting the functional outcomes and mortality rate of comatose patients.

Highlights

  • Coma is a state of deep and prolonged unconsciousness in which a person cannot be awakened, unable to normally respond to sound, light or painful stimuli and comatose patients do not initiate actions voluntarily and lack normal sleep-wake cycle [1, 2]

  • We tested the INCNS score for its prognostic reliability of the 3-month functional outcome and mortality as well as NICU mortality rate in comatose patients, and compared the INCNS score with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score (FOUR), and APACHE II scores based on their prognostic value concerning comatose patients

  • These results suggest that the INCNS scores could be a reliable tool to assess the outcome of comatose patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coma is a state of deep and prolonged unconsciousness in which a person cannot be awakened, unable to normally respond to sound, light or painful stimuli and comatose patients do not initiate actions voluntarily and lack normal sleep-wake cycle [1, 2]. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score (FOUR) has been proven to be more reliable in assessing neurocritically ill patients than GCS mainly because of its inclusion of neurological reflex and respiratory examinations [6, 10]. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system is one of the most commonly used scores for critically ill patients and contains systemic condition scoring that is missing in FOUR, but it uses GCS as neurological functional scoring item, which lacks brainstem reflex examination. This might affect the prognostic accuracy of APACHE II [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call