Abstract

Fundamental and thematic climate data records derived from satellite observations provide unique information for climate monitoring and research. Since any satellite only operates over a relatively short period of time, creating a climate data record also requires the combination of space-borne measurements from a series of several (often similar) satellite sensors. Simply combining calibrated measurements from several sensors can, however, produce an inconsistent climate data record. This is particularly true of older, historic sensors whose behaviour in space was often different from their behaviour during pre-launch calibration and more scientific value can be derived from considering the series of historical and present satellites as a whole. Here, we consider harmonisation as a process that obtains new calibration coefficients for revised sensor calibration models by comparing calibrated measurements over appropriate satellite-to-satellite matchups, such as simultaneous nadir overpasses and which reconciles the calibration of different sensors given their estimated spectral response function differences. We present the concept of a framework that establishes calibration coefficients and their uncertainty and error covariance for an arbitrary number of sensors in a metrologically-rigorous manner. We describe harmonisation and its mathematical formulation as an inverse problem that is extremely challenging when some hundreds of millions of matchups are involved and the errors of fundamental sensor measurements are correlated. We solve the harmonisation problem as marginalised errors in variables regression. The algorithm involves computation of first and second-order partial derivatives using Algorithmic Differentiation. Finally, we present re-calibrated radiances from a series of nine Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer sensors showing that the new time series has smaller matchup differences compared to the unharmonised case while being consistent with uncertainty statistics.

Highlights

  • Stable and accurate long-term Fundamental Climate Data Records (FCDRs) are indispensable for many aspects of climate research and services

  • We have considered the series of nine Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors on-board the NOAA 11–19 and MetOp-A satellites to be harmonised with respect to the Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) on-board Envisat as designated reference

  • We have presented a metrologically rigorous marginalised errors-in-variables (MEIV) approach to achieve a harmonised calibration of sensors onboard a series of Earth observation satellites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stable and accurate long-term Fundamental Climate Data Records (FCDRs) are indispensable for many aspects of climate research and services. Metrological assessment of historical climate trends and climate variability are feasible, if such FCDRs are harmonised and include quantified uncertainties per datum [1,2,3,4] Such climate data records are important for assimilation in a reanalysis, as well as for the calculation of statistics that are needed to assess the state of the Earth’s climate and to analyse climate extremes. Disruption of operational routines (such as change of equipment or operator personnel, change of receiving station or environment, and change of observing practices or procedures including changes in the pre-launch analysis) may lead to misleading artifacts. Such artefacts may affect the results of climate data analyses considerably, in particular the results of climate trend analyses. In-flight or post-flight sensor calibration must take particular care to eliminate such artefacts as far as is feasible

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call