Abstract

Process monitoring plays an important role in ensuring the safety and stable operation of equipment in a large-scale process. This paper proposes a novel data-driven process monitoring framework, termed the ensemble adaptive sparse Bayesian transfer learning machine (EAdspB-TLM), for nonlinear fault diagnosis. The proposed framework has the following advantages: Firstly, the probabilistic relevance vector machine (PrRVM) under Bayesian framework is re-derived so that it can be used to forecast the plant operating conditions. Secondly, we extend the PrRVM method and assimilate transfer learning into the sparse Bayesian learning framework to provide it with the transferring ability. Thirdly, the source domain (SD) data are re-enabled to alleviate the issue of insufficient training data. Finally, the proposed EAdspB-TLM framework was effectively applied to monitor a real wastewater treatment process (WWTP) and a Tennessee Eastman chemical process (TECP). The results further demonstrate that the proposed method is feasible.

Highlights

  • Due to the increasing diversification of industrial demand, the combination of process and equipment results in system structures become increasingly complex

  • The source domain (SD) data are filtered according to labeled target domain (LTD) data, in such a way that SD data and LTD data have the same types of labels

  • BOD5, and Figure 6b shows the curve of the sludge index (SVI)

Read more

Summary

A Novel Ensemble Adaptive Sparse Bayesian Transfer

Hongchao Cheng 1,2 , Yiqi Liu 1, * , Daoping Huang 1 , Chong Xu 1 and Jing Wu 1,3. Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.

Introduction
Transfer Learning
Sparse Bayesian for Fault Diagnosis
Adaptive Boosting Technology and Transfer Learning
Adaptive
Adaptive Probabilistic Relevance Vector Machine
Updating the Weight Vector and Sparse Analysis
Ensemble Detection Model and Key Performance Indicator n o
Experimental Design and Compared Approaches
Background
Analysis and Discussion of Experimental Results
September to the following
Findings
Section 4.1
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.