Abstract
ABSTRACTControversy still exists regarding the best clinical assessment test for chondromalacia patellae (CMP). Our study aims to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of a novel clinical test for CMP, the “Patella Slide Test” (PST) against the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. We included 221 consecutive patients planned for elective knee arthroscopic surgery. An MRI scan of the symptomatic knee was performed prior to surgery. On the day of surgery, each patient was examined using the PST followed by a knee arthroscopy to assess the quality of the chondral surfaces of the patellofemoral joint. The MRI and PST results were compared against the arthroscopic findings that served as the gold standard. The PST (0.89) was statistically more sensitive than MRI (0.67) in diagnosing CMP. The PST (0.89) also had a greater negative predictive value (NPV) than MRI (0.74). However, MRI (0.94) was more specific than the PST (0.85). The differences in accuracy and positive predictive value of the PST versus MRI were not statically significant. In conclusion, the PST shows high sensitivity and has a greater NPV than MRI as a clinical test for diagnosing CMP.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
