A novel break site of EML4-ALK report and a rare PRKAR1A-ALK report analyzed by different ALK detection platforms in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Abstract

Backgrounddetection of anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) rearrangements in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a routine pathological diagnosis worldwide.Methodsthere are three major conventional diagnostic methods for ALK fusions: fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); immunohistochemistry (Ventana IHC (D5F3)); and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) technology as is a new tool for ALK status detection with great potential. These four methods are highly consistent in detecting ALK status (coincidence rate >96%). However, discrepancies in ALK status have been found in some patients among these methods, which causes confusion for clinicians.Results and conclusionin this study, we analyzed two patients whose ALK statuses were not consistent using these four methods. We explored the potential reasons for deviation of the test results and found a novel EML4‐ALK break site, which had been not described previously.