Abstract

Major evolutionary innovations can greatly influence subsequent evolution. While many major transitions occurred in the deep past, male live-bearing fishes (family Poeciliidae) more recently evolved a novel body plan. This group possesses a three-region axial skeleton, with one region—the ano-urogenital region—representing a unique body region accommodating male genitalic structures (gonopodial complex). Here we evaluate several hypotheses for the evolution of diversity in this region and examine its role in the evolution of male body shape. Examining Gambusia fishes, we tested a priori predictions for (1) joint influence of gonopodial-complex traits on mating performance, (2) correlated evolution of gonopodial-complex traits at macro- and microevolutionary scales, and (3) predator-driven evolution of gonopodial-complex traits in a post-Pleistocene radiation of Bahamas mosquitofish. We found the length of the sperm-transfer organ (gonopodium) and its placement along the body (gonopodial anterior transposition) jointly influenced mating success, with correlational selection favoring particular trait combinations. Despite these two traits functionally interacting during mating, we found no evidence for their correlated evolution at macro- or microevolutionary scales. In contrast, we did uncover correlated evolution of modified vertebral hemal spines (part of the novel body region) and gonopodial anterior transposition at both evolutionary scales, matching predictions of developmental connections between these components. Developmental linkages in the ano-urogenital region apparently play key roles in evolutionary trajectories, but multiple selective agents likely act on gonopodium length and cause less predictable evolution. Within Bahamas mosquitofish, evolution of hemal-spine morphology, and gonopodial anterior transposition across predation regimes was quite predictable, with populations evolving under high predation risk showing more modified hemal spines with greater modifications and a more anteriorly positioned gonopodium. These changes in the ano-urogenital vertebral region have facilitated adaptive divergence in swimming abilities and body shape between predation regimes. Gonopodium surface area, but not length, evolved as predicted in Bahamas mosquitofish, consistent with a previously suggested tradeoff between natural and sexual selection on gonopodium size. These results provide insight into how restructured body plans offer novel evolutionary solutions. Here, a novel body region—originally evolved to aid sperm transfer—was apparently co-opted to alter whole-organism performance, facilitating phenotypic diversification.

Highlights

  • Evolutionary change is contingent on past evolutionary history (Gould and Vrba, 1982; Price et al, 2000; Gould, 2002; Losos, 2009; Barve and Wagner, 2013; Blount et al, 2018)

  • Recent work revealed male livebearing fishes in the family Poeciliidae have altered this ancestral body plan with a novel three-part body plan composed of the two aforementioned regions plus a third region known as the ano-urogenital vertebral region (Rosa-Molinar et al, 1994, 1996; Rivera-Rivera et al, 2010)

  • We found significant positive correlational selection on gonopodium length and gonopodial anterior transposition when using either genital contact success or efficiency as our estimate of mating success, but not when using the number of genital contacts as the mating-success surrogate (Supplementary Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evolutionary change is contingent on past evolutionary history (Gould and Vrba, 1982; Price et al, 2000; Gould, 2002; Losos, 2009; Barve and Wagner, 2013; Blount et al, 2018). Recent work revealed male livebearing fishes in the family Poeciliidae have altered this ancestral body plan with a novel three-part body plan composed of the two aforementioned regions plus a third region known as the ano-urogenital vertebral region (Rosa-Molinar et al, 1994, 1996; Rivera-Rivera et al, 2010). This body plan appears to have evolved at least 44 million years ago (Hrbek et al, 2007). Because of the relatively little research conducted on this novel body plan to date, and the emphasis on Poeciliidae so far, its origination and extent is not fully understood—this body plan could be more widespread throughout much of Atherinomorpha

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.