Abstract

Abstract. Being one of the most frightening disasters, earthquakes frequently cause huge damages to buildings, facilities and human beings. Although the prediction of characteristics of an earthquake seems to be impossible, its loss and damage is predictable in advance. Seismic loss estimation models tend to evaluate the extent to which the urban areas are vulnerable to earthquakes. Many factors contribute to the vulnerability of urban areas against earthquakes including age and height of buildings, the quality of the materials, the density of population and the location of flammable facilities. Therefore, seismic vulnerability assessment is a multi-criteria problem. A number of multi criteria decision making models have been proposed based on a single expert. The main objective of this paper is to propose a model which facilitates group multi criteria decision making based on the concept of majority voting. The main idea of majority voting is providing a computational tool to measure the degree to which different experts support each other’s opinions and make a decision regarding this measure. The applicability of this model is examined in Tehran metropolitan area which is located in a seismically active region. The results indicate that neglecting the experts which get lower degrees of support from others enables the decision makers to avoid the extreme strategies. Moreover, a computational method is proposed to calculate the degree of optimism in the experts’ opinions.

Highlights

  • Earthquakes are natural phenomenon and neglecting them could cause huge damages to urban areas

  • Density Induced Ordered Weighted Averaging (DIOWA) operator facilitates the decision making based on majority voting

  • This paper indicates the applicability of density induced ordered weighted averaging operator for majority voting in group multi criteria decision making problems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earthquakes are natural phenomenon and neglecting them could cause huge damages to urban areas. Earthquake could be regarded as the most destructive disaster in Iran (M Hashemi & Alesheikh, 2012; Shuwen & Zhi, 1990). This paper focuses on the second part, predicting the consequences This step is crucial for planning how to reducing the effects of the disaster. The main objective of this research is proposing a model which facilitates majority voting in seismic loss estimation for group decision making. The second objective of the paper is finding out which areas of the city are more vulnerable to earthquake. In order to assess the physical vulnerability it is assumed that North Tehran Fault is activated and caused an earthquake. Majority voting lead to decision making based on the experts which their opinion was supported by the others (Boroushaki & Malczewski, 2010). In the current research DIOWA is applied to enable decision makers to make decisions with lower weights for experts whose opinions was far from the others (Ma & Guo, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call