Abstract

The thermic effect of food (TEF) is the well‐known concept in spite of its difficulty for measuring. The gold standard for evaluating the TEF is the difference in energy expenditure between fed and fasting states (ΔEE). Alternatively, energy expenditure at 0 activity (EE 0) is estimated from the intercept of the linear relationship between energy expenditure and physical activity to eliminate activity thermogenesis from the measurement, and the TEF is calculated as the difference between EE 0 and postabsorptive resting metabolic rate (RMR) or sleeping metabolic rate (SMR). However, the accuracy of the alternative methods has been questioned. To improve TEF estimation, we propose a novel method as our original TEF calculation method to calculate EE 0 using integrated physical activity over a specific time interval. We aimed to identify which alternative methods of TEF calculation returns reasonable estimates, that is, positive value as well as estimates close to ΔEE. Seven men participated in two sessions (with and without breakfast) of whole‐body indirect calorimetry, and physical activity was monitored with a triaxial accelerometer. Estimates of TEF by three simplified methods were compared to ΔEE. ΔEE, EE 0 above SMR, and our original method returned positive values for the TEF after breakfast in all measurements. TEF estimates of our original method was indistinguishable from those based on the ΔEE, whereas those as EE 0 above RMR and EE 0 above SMR were slightly lower and higher, respectively. Our original method was the best among the three simplified TEF methods as it provided positive estimates in all the measurements that were close to the value derived from gold standard for all measurements.

Highlights

  • Total energy expenditure comprises three principal components: the basal metabolic rate (BMR), energetic cost of physical activity, and thermic effect of food (TEF)

  • We propose a novel method for calculating the TEF by removing nonexercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) from the time course of postprandial energy expenditure

  • Despite the significant difference in energy expenditure during sleep between the two dietary conditions, there were no unexpected increases in energy expenditure or physical activity (2240 Æ 119 and 2265 Æ 82 counts/min) such as using the toilet and moving around the room

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Total energy expenditure comprises three principal components: the basal metabolic rate (BMR), energetic cost of physical activity, and thermic effect of food (TEF). The energetic cost of physical activity can be separated into two components: exerciserelated activity thermogenesis and nonexercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) (Levine et al 1999; Levine 2007). Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call