Abstract

The kinetically derived maximal dose (KMD) provides a toxicologically relevant upper range for the determination of chemical safety. Here, we describe a new way of calculating the KMD that is based on sound Bayesian, theoretical, biochemical, and toxicokinetic principles, that avoids the problems of relying upon the area under the curve (AUC) approach that has often been used. Our new, mathematically rigorous approach is based on converting toxicokinetic data to the overall, or system-wide, Michaelis–Menten curve (which is the slope function for the toxicokinetic data) using Bayesian methods and using the “kneedle” algorithm to find the “knee” or “elbow”—the point at which there is diminishing returns in the velocity of the Michaelis–Menten curve (or acceleration of the toxicokinetic curve). Our work fundamentally reshapes the KMD methodology, placing it within the well-established Michaelis–Menten theoretical framework by defining the KMD as the point where the kinetic rate approximates the Michaelis–Menten asymptote at higher concentrations. By putting the KMD within the Michaelis–Menten framework, we leverage existing biochemical and pharmacological concepts such as “saturation” to establish the region where the KMD is likely to exist. The advantage of defining KMD as a region, rather than as an inflection point along the curve, is that a region reflects uncertainty and clarifies that there is no single point where the curve is expected to “break;” rather, there is a region where the curve begins to taper off as it approaches the asymptote (Vmax in the Michaelis–Menten equation).

Highlights

  • Regulatory toxicology studies are conducted to help society avoid hazards and unacceptable risks that might be posed by exposure to chemicals

  • This paper focuses on regulatory toxicology—how should studies be designed to identify the safe exposure levels? We argue that the old standard, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), should be abandoned, and that regulatory toxicology studies should embrace a more objectively defined kinetically derived maximum dose (KMD) that we introduce here

  • We use toxicokinetic data, our approach is based on Michaelis–Menten mechanics, and a mathematical analysis called the “kneedle” algorithm is used to identify the point of “diminishing returns”—the point at which the change in slope clearly demarcates the curve being nearly indistinguishable from the asymptote (Satopaa et al 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Regulatory toxicology studies are conducted to help society avoid hazards and unacceptable risks that might be posed by exposure to chemicals. Hazards, are not intrinsic to the chemical itself and depend upon the dose and the conditions under which consumers, workers, plants, and animals encounter chemicals (McCarty et al 2020), avoiding hazards and unacceptable risks requires identifying doses of chemicals that produce no adverse effects; see explanation in our companion paper, Borgert et al (2021). The goal is to ensure safety by providing. Contrast this with investigational toxicology, which is focused on understanding why a chemical is toxic—what is the mode of action, what are the biomarkers that can be used to infer toxicity, are there specific chemical structures that should be avoided in the future?. This paper focuses on regulatory toxicology—how should studies be designed to identify the safe exposure levels? We argue that the old standard, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), should be abandoned, and that regulatory toxicology studies should embrace a more objectively defined kinetically derived maximum dose (KMD) that we introduce here

Archives of Toxicology
Finding the KMD
An Application Example
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.