Abstract

The potencies of topical corticosteroid products have mainly been classified using clinical data but in some instances, the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) vasoconstrictor assay (VCA) to assess the skin blanching response has also been used. However, the reported skin blanching response data were often based on a single visual reading and lack information on the dose (amount/quantity) or dose duration. Although several lists classifying potencies of various topical corticosteroid products have been published, the inherent potencies of topical corticosteroid raw materials used as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) have not been investigated. The objective was to rank the inherent potencies of topical corticosteroid APIs and to standardize dosing such that the relevant compounds could be compared on a normalized molar basis. The potencies of clobetasol propionate, halcinonide, mometasone furoate, and fluocinolone acetonide were compared using the resulting Emax data following the fitting of the relevant response data to the Emax model where mometasone furoate > fluocinolone acetonide = clobetasol propionate > halcinonide. This ranking lists the respective inherent potencies of the APIs, which will facilitate the choice of a suitable candidate for incorporation into an appropriate topical corticosteroid product for a specific clinical indication.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPublisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

  • Clobetasol propionate, mometasone furoate, and fluocinolone acetonide were purchased from Sigma® Aldrich (Kappelweg, Schnelldorf, Germany) and halcinonide was obtained as a gift from Ranbaxy®, (Mumbai, India)

  • A classification system based on Emax data is hereby proposed: Mometasone furoate is assigned to a tentative class I based on its Emax, with fluocinolone acetonide and clobetasol propionate as tentative class II since they were found to be equipotent but less potent than mometasone furoate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Unlike other therapeutic classes of drugs, such as antifungals or antibacterials, topical corticosteroid products have been ranked and classified depending on their potencies [1]. The main method to evaluate the potencies of topical corticosteroid products has been through the results of their clinical use and randomized clinical comparative studies [2]. In the USA, topical corticosteroid products are ranked into seven classes from superpotent to least potent while a four-category system is used in Northern Europe, United Kingdom (UK), France, Germany, Netherlands, and New Zealand to classify potencies [1,3,4,5,6].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.