Abstract

For conflicting or redundant knowledge, designated knowledge are usually followed to implement prioritized or direct deletions. Due to the uncertainty of uncertain knowledge itself, it is difficult to treat conflicting knowledge, and the citation of erroneous knowledge leads to mistakes in decision making. It is therefore a necessity to confirm the existence and reliability of the cited knowledge.The current study attempts to provide an uncertain frame-based knowledge conflict treatment algorithm by integrating a group decision and an uncertain inference. In the algorithm, a "reliability factor" refers to the reliability level of the conflicting or redundant knowledge, while the "certainty factor" indicates the existence of the knowledge itself. A "certainty reliability index" is used to show both the existence of the knowledge itself and its reliability. For conflicting or redundant knowledge, it is suggested that the knowledge with a higher reliability factor be chosen. This can then effectively prevent or minimize mistakes in making decisions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.