Abstract
In a recent paper [2] we gave a Noumerov-type method with minimal phase-lag for the integration of second order initial-value problems: y″ = f( t, y), y( t 0) = y 0, y′( t 0) = y′ 0. However, the method given there is implicit. We show here the interesting result that if the Noumerov-type methods of [2] are made explicit with the help of the classical second order method, then there exists a selection of the free parameter for which the resulting method has a considerably small frequency distortion of size ( 1 40320 )H 6 and also a (slightly) larger interval of periodicity of size 2.75 than the phase-lag of size ( 1 12096 )H 6 and interval of periodicity of size 2.71 for the implicit method [2]. More interestingly, it turns out that Noumerov made explicit of Chawla [3] also has less frequency distortion than the (implicit) Noumerov method. (We shall assume a familiarity with the notation and discussion given in [2].)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.