Abstract
In a recent paper Koiter (5) discussed a principle of stationary complementary energy for the finite deformation of elastic materials. The complementary energy functional he uses depends only on the components of the nominal stress, and not on the displacement field. He, incorrectly, attributes the principle to Zubov (14).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
