Abstract
Metaphor universality has been a topic of long debate among interested researchers. A byproduct of claiming the universality of metaphors is admitting a common human cognition. This cognition is based on different factors external to the cognition itself. In the present study, metaphors from Arabic tweets were analyzed and compared to metaphors in English found in published research. Based on this comparison, it was concluded that metaphors are universal and culturally specific at two different levels. On one level, the shared human anatomy poses universality, and on the other level, factors working against such universality affect the cultural specificity of metaphors. Kövecses (2010b) proposes a list of factors including awareness of context, differential memory, differential concerns and interests, differential cognitive preference and styles, and creativity. Considering languages other than Arabic and English in the comparison can be a promising future research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
