Abstract
ABSTRACT After a short survey of the reasons why the label ‘Neo-Ricardianism’ customarily fixed to the surplus approach to political economy should be discarded for good, the note focuses on Marx's analysis of the influence of income distribution on the incentive to invest and technical change. It is held that it is principally this analysis that should be taken as the foundation for any further development of the surplus approach, with a view to putting together the essential elements of an alternative theory of employment and activity levels within which also the role of the State and its economic policy may be critically dealt with.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
