Abstract

Let $\Gamma=(G, \sigma)$ be a connected signed graph, and $L(\Gamma)$ be its Laplacian and $\mathcal{L}(\Gamma)$ its normalized Laplacian with eigenvalues $\lambda_1\geq \lambda_2\geq\cdots \geq \lambda_n$ and $\mu_1\geq \mu_2\geq\cdots \geq \mu_n$, respectively. It is known that a signed graph $\Gamma$ is balanced if and only if $\lambda_n=0$ (or $\mu_n=0$). We show that $\lambda_n$ and $\mu_n$ measure how much $\Gamma$ is far from being balanced by proving that \begin{align*}\mu_n(\Gamma)&\leq\min\{\frac{2\epsilon(\Gamma)}{m}, \frac{\nu(\Gamma)}{\nu(\Gamma)+\nu_1(\Gamma)}\},\\ \lambda_n(\Gamma)&\leq \min\{\lambda_1(\Gamma'): \Gamma-\Gamma'\,\,\,{is balanced}\}, \end{align*}where $\nu(\Gamma)$ (resp. $\epsilon(\Gamma)$) denotes the frustration number (resp. the frustration index) of $\Gamma$, that is the minimum number of vertices (resp. edges) to be deleted such that the signed graph is balanced.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call