Abstract
David Lack (1947; 1954) suggested that clutch size in birds is adapted to correspond to the maximum number of young that parents can nourish. The studies that Lack’s pioneering work stimulated have revealed both supporting and contrary evidence (see Lack, 1954, 1966; Wynne-Edwards, 1962; Skutch, 1949; 1967; Klomp, 1970; Hussell, 1972). Lack’s hypothesis also has been criticised on theoretical grounds. Skutch (1949) suggested that predation could determine optimum clutch size if the loss of nests to predators were to increase as brood size increases, hence as feeding visits, begging and general activity about the nest increase. As Lack (1949) pointed out in response, whether predation or starvation is the principal cause of death, the optimum brood size is none the less that which produces the most young on average.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
