Abstract
In this paper, we re-examine the change in persistence hypothesis for inflation, using data from Noriega et al. (Empir Econ 44:1243–1265, 2013) and the new testing procedures by Kejriwal et al. (Econom Theory 29:289–323, 2013). Our results display more evidence of change in persistence than Noriega et al.’s paper, with some remarkable conflicting conclusions with respect to their work, although results depend on the measure of inflation: seasonally adjusted, trend-cycle component or interannual.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
