Abstract
THE admirable review article by Joseph S. Davis sets a high standard in workmanship. The review is many sided, meticulous, and on many specific points penetrating. Davis concurs in many of the lesser findings put forward in the book, but he is obviously much disturbed by the two main theses that emerge. He cannot accept the conclusion that a persistent excess supply of labor, with the attendant low per capita earnings, characterizes agriculture in the long run. Nor is he willing to take the cyclical instability of farm income associated with business fluctuations and treat it as part of the general problem of maintaining the aggregate demand by means of monetary-fiscal measures that are countercyclical in nature. Davis' dissent, therefore, is not with regard to details but on fundamentals. The basic differences between his approach and that underlying Agriculture in an Unstable Economy go much deeper than his liberal praise of the book might indicate. They are rooted partly in economic theory, partly in the empirical evidence considered relevant, and partly in concealed valuations. These analytical differences can best be made explicit by focusing first on the idea of equilibrium and second on fluctuations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.