Abstract
Abstract In the present article, it is shown that both the methods presented in Kumar et al. (2013) do not possess the order of convergence as claimed. One of the two methods, derivative involved method possesses the convergence rate of eighth order whereas the other derivative free method possesses sixth order convergence. The theoretical convergence rate is also validated by computational order of convergence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
