Abstract
Any organization is happy with—and likely to promote—a man who is wise enough to make correct decisions for its successful operation. But in a large bureaucratic organization, may not statistical probability alone result in there being at least one man who makes all the correct decisions but who is no more truly competent than his less successful peers? How do we distinguish the wise from the pseudowise? These intriguing questions and some of their ramifications for political and organizational behavior are here discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
