Abstract
The paper points up limitations in the standard undergraduate treatment of third-degree price discrimination by monopolists. While such treatments allude to qualitative distinctions between higher and lower priced alternatives, failure to capture those distinctions in underlying cost and demand structures can result in only partial and possibly misleading conclusions about the nature and consequences of price discrimination. Building on earlier work in the derivation of quality-differentiated demand (see SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2576773 and https://ssrn.com/abstract=3107103), the paper compares the standard analysis of price discrimination with one that explicitly accounts for monopoly power in manipulating quality choices. The example provided illustrates the potential for substantially greater profits and greater efficiency losses by forcing some groups of consumers into suboptimal quality choices once quality variations are explicitly accounted for.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
