Abstract

Summary The effects of temporal and spatial definition of item sequence on order learning were examined by means of a position-judgment procedure. In an effort to control presentation intermittency, a low-similarity series of 12 CVCs was presented to 48 male and female undergraduates at a 2-second rate either individually or simultaneously in a repeated horizontal array. Results showed weak advantages during later trials and in middle serial positions from temporal presentation, in contradiction to prior findings. It was argued that the results could be procedural artifacts and that an unbiased assessment of performance and of distinctiveness topographies associated with temporally or spatially defined sequence may be infeasible.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.