Abstract

Over the years, students have been taught to rely solely on the Neyman-Pearson Lemma in the hypothesis testing problem of a simple hypothesis against a simple alternative hypothesis to obtain a most powerful test, or equivalently, a best critical region of size β. If a particular β level is not attainable by the lemma, randomization can be employed. However, randomized tests are impractical in reality. In this note, illustrations are given to show that most powerful tests may still be found in discrete situations where the Neyman-Pearson Lemma does not apply and randomized tests are not adopted.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.