Abstract
When we compare an experimental treatment with the best standard therapy, Zelen first proposed use of the single-consent randomized design to increase the accrual rate of patients into trials. Under the single-consent randomized design, I developed two other simple test procedures to improve the power of the commonly used procedure for the intention-to-treat analysis in testing whether there is a difference in treatment effects in this article. Based on Monte Carlo simulation, I evaluated and compared these three test procedures with respect to type 1 error and power. I demonstrated that the two test procedures developed here outperformed the commonly employed test procedure in a variety of situations. Finally, I employed an example by studying the effect of vitamin A supplementation on reducing mortality in preschool children to illustrate the use of these test procedures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.