Abstract
This brief note discusses Fukuyama’s paper [Fukuyama, H., 2000. Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 125, 93–112]. We prove that the Proof of Lemma 1 by Fukuyama (2000) is incorrect due to incorrect substitution. In addition, we exemplify our conclusion by a counterexample taken from Fukuyama (2000). Thus all conclusions, based on Lemma 1, of Fukuyama (2000) cannot be reached and are left for further research.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
