Abstract
In De Baets et al. [6] the authors define, for a copula C, an idempotent transformation D[C] which, in some cases, generates new copulas. In this note we give a (negative) answer to a question posed in [6], showing that D[C] is not necessarily a copula when C is an absolutely continuous Archimedean copula.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
