Abstract

The parameters of the models described by Rumelhart and Greeno in this journal (1971) are constrained in certain ways. Neglect of this fact in their paper leads them to an inadmissible set of parameter values, and an invalid argument and statement concerning the equivalence of two models. However, their conclusion that the Restle model fits their data better than the Luce model remains unchanged.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.