Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the problems with the contemporary nosology of 'depression' and to discuss the key linguistic and phenomenological aspects that are essential prerequisites for a clinically meaningful typology of depressive disorders. The paper comprises observations and reflections drawn from clinical work. First, the use of the unqualified, stock term 'depression' is counterproductive, as are the diagnostic non-entities of 'major depression' and 'dysthymia'. Second, the core psychopathology in melancholic depression is a loss of self-confidence, which helps explain the frequent co-occurrence of 'anxiety' with 'depression'. Third, descriptive, non-technical terms such as 'demoralisation' and 'grief' are most helpful in formulating non-melancholic forms of depression and thus useful in differential diagnosis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.