A non-inferiority study of MRI versus CT for staging and image-defined risk factor assessment in the preoperative work-up of abdominopelvic neuroblastoma

Abstract

BackgroundNeuroblastoma accounts for 15 % of cancer deaths in children. Complete surgical resection is associated with a higher overall survival rate but also a higher morbidity rate. An international group of experts has defined a nomenclature of image-defined risk factors (IDRFs) for the determination of operability and the anticipation of reasonably foreseeable complications of surgery. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging modality (CT or MRI) for the assessment of IDRFs. The objective of the present study was to determine the non-inferiority of MRI vs. CT in the preoperative assessment of abdominopelvic neuroblastoma. The secondary objective was to assess the contribution of gadolinium contrast enhancement. MethodsAll children diagnosed with abdominopelvic neuroblastoma and whose preoperative work-up included a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scan of the abdomen and pelvis between January 2014 and January 2023 were included. To evaluate the IDRFs, all the images were reviewed in three steps: (i) non-contrast MRI scans, (ii) both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced MRI scans, and (iii) contrast-enhanced CT scans. ResultsTwenty-five patients were found to be eligible, and fifteen were included. The mean time interval between MRI and preoperative CT was 23 days. In all patients, the identified IDRFs were similar for all three imaging modalities. Fourteen patients underwent full resection of the tumour. The surgical reports were fully consistent with the IDRFs described on CT and/or MRI. ConclusionA high-resolution three-dimensional T2 MRI sequence agreed fully with contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of IDRFs. Contrast-enhanced MRI did not add value. However, surgeons will need time to adapt to this MRI-based approach and learn how to interpret the results with confidence.